Former Rep. George Santos was sentenced Friday to more than seven years in federal prison for widespread fraud and identity theft, a legal consequence following his expulsion from Congress.
Judge Joanna Seybert handed down the 87-month sentence in U.S. District Court in Central Islip, New York. Santos, 36, must surrender to begin serving his term by July 25.
Santos pleaded guilty last year to wire fraud and aggravated identity theft charges. He admitted orchestrating a campaign finance scheme, fraudulently collecting unemployment benefits during the COVID-19 pandemic, and lying on financial disclosure forms filed with the House.
As part of his plea agreement, Santos also agreed to pay approximately $580,000 in restitution and forfeiture. The court ruled he must pay restitution totaling $373,750.
His sentencing marks another step in a dramatic downfall that saw him rise unexpectedly to national prominence only to be expelled from the House in December 2023 without a conviction, a rare move by his colleagues.
Prosecutors had recommended the 87-month sentence, arguing a lengthy term was needed to deter future fraud and that Santos showed little remorse for his actions, even after a 2023 indictment. His defense lawyers had requested a two-year sentence, the mandatory minimum for the identity theft charge, citing his acceptance of responsibility.
During the sentencing hearing, Santos, appearing subdued, apologized and said he was humbled. This contrasted sharply with his public image built on fabricated details about his past, including claims of being a college volleyball star or a Wall Street financier. A 2022 investigation first exposed many of these deceptions.
Prosecutors detailed how Santos deceived donors and stole identities, including from family members, as part of his effort to fund his winning campaign. His plea deal solidified admissions tied to these schemes. The campaign finance scheme became a major focus of inquiries leading to his federal charges.
Judge Seybert appeared unconvinced by his tearful apology in court.
“Where is your remorse?” she asked. “Where do I see it?”
